Conclusion: Rav Moshe Feinstein ztz”l on the Neglect of Shnayim Mikra v’Echad Targum

In Iggros Moshe (OC 5:17), Rav Moshe Feinstein ztz”l (d. 1986) wrote of the neglect he saw in our commitment to the mitzvah of reviewing the weekly Torah portion Shnayim Mikra v’Echad Targum. To conclude our series on this mitzvah, I would like to present Rav Moshe’s teshuvah in its entirety, translated by the yours truly, without commentary.


On the subject that a mitzvah that is binding upon each of us to review the Torah portion each week twice in the original text and once in translation – and our rabbis, even from among the Rishonim, added that we should combine to learn also the commentary of Rashi on each portion – is very neglected, even by many Torah-observant Jews.

It is simple and clear that no person is exempted from any mitzvah under rabbinic law based on the claim that he’s involved in Torah study. Similarly, no one is exempted from this mitzvah. Just the opposite! Even one for whom Torah is his occupation, like Rashbi and his colleagues who were exempted from prayer under rabbinic law, they were nevertheless obligated to review the parsha Shnayim Mikra v’Echad Targum. This is also Torah study and the obligation of Torah study also includes Chumash.

This is so even according to the opinion in Tosfos (Kiddushin 31a, s.v. lo tzricha, in the name of Rabbeinu Tam) that learning the Babylonian Talmud also fulfills the obligation to study Chumash because of the verses that are included among it. It is also true according to the Rambam (Hilchos Talmud Torah 1:12), that after one already knows the written Torah very well, he is no longer obligated according to the Rambam to study the written Torah at any time – and he certainly no longer needs to divide his study time into thirds. In any event, one is still obligated even according to the Rambam to dedicate some study time to the written Torah.

This being the case, it is clear that reviewing Shnayim Mikra v’Echad Targum is certainly included in one’s fundamental obligation of Torah study each week, for it was this learning that the Sages singled out for each week. It is certainly obligatory and one cannot exempt this study by learning something else from the Torah, neither written nor oral, other than this extra mitzvah that the Sages required.

Consequently, there is no exemption from this, even for those to whom Torah is their occupation like Rashbi and his colleagues. This is specifically true of our generation, in which no one can claim to be so expert in the Chumash.