3,252. People Who Shouldn't Take Terumah (But It Counts if They Do)

Terumos 4:3

Let’s say that someone took terumah from another person’s produce without permission, or he enters another person’s field and takes produce without permission and he separates terumah from what he took. If the owner tells him that he could have taken better produce, and there is in fact better produce than what he separated as terumah, then the terumah is valid because the owner didn’t object. If there’s not actually better produce, then the terumah is not valid because the owner’s words were intended as an objection. If the owner gathered produce and added it to what the intruder separated, then the terumah is valid regardless of whether or not the owner possesses better produce.

Terumos 4:4

There are five who don’t separate terumah but if they do, what they took is terumah. These include a person who can’t hear but who can speak – because he can’t hear the bracha, who can’t speak but who can hear and one who is naked – because they can’t recite the bracha, an intoxicated person and a blind person – because they can’t visually distinguish the nicest produce in order to separate it as terumah.