Aliya-by-Aliya Parshat T'ruma 5759

Numbers in [square brackets] are the mitzva-countof the Sefer HaChinuch.


First Aliya -16 p'sukim (25:1-16)

G-d tells Moshe to tell the People to donate materials in amounts that "each person sees fit". The donations were to be of gold, silver, copper; dyed wools (blue, purple, red), fine linen; goats' hair fabric, red-dyed sheepskin, Tachash skins; acacia wood; oil for light, spices for the anointing oil and the incense offerings;gemstones for the Eiphod and the Choshen.

"And they shall make for Me a Sanctuary, and I will dwell in their midst" [95]. This well-known pasuk constitutes the mitzva to build the Mishkan in that generation, and the Beit HaMikdash in later times. Each time the Mishkan was taken apart, transported, and reassembled, the mitzva was fulfilled. It was fulfilled by ShlomoHaMelech and his generation, and by Ezra HaSofer and his generation. It will be fulfilled IY"H when the third Beit HaMikdash will be built, IY"H in our own time.

[sdt] The "standard" interpretation of B'TOCHAM, is that G-d promises to dwell among the Jewish People. Some interpret the word as applying to each individual Jew. This idea is echoed in the famous song/poem from Sefer Chareidim - BIL' VAVI MISHKAN EVNEH, in my heart I will built a Sanctuary... This, of course, does notnegate the straightforward meaning of the mitzva, namely to build an actual Mikdash. Simultaneously, the construction has to be on a communal and personal level too.

Mitzva Watch The Rambam gives 14 rules for the counting of the 613 mitzvot. Rule #12 is that it is not "appropriate" to count as separate mitzvot those commands that are part of a more all- encompassing mitzva. Therefore, the Rambam does NOT count among the 613 the mitzvot to make the Aron, Menora, Shulchan, Altars, etc. since theyare included in Building the Sanctuary. Other mitzva-counters disagree. Ramban, for example, counts the Aron as a separate mitzva (but not the other sacred vessels). Each mitzva-counter has criteria that determine how to count mitzvot. No one is right or wrong in this issue. There are just different ways of looking atmitzvot. It is often instructive to try to derive a message from the different ways of counting Taryag. In this case, we can say - ARON, a stand-alone element of the Mikdash or part of the whole. To be sure, it is both. But where is the emphasis?

Mitzva Watch Note that although all the positive commands related to the details of each of the vessels are included within the "over-mitzva" of building the Mikdash (and everything in it), this prohibition is counted separately. In other words, the commands to make the Aron, to plate it with gold, to attach rings, to make poles, toput a decorative border around the top of the Aron, to make the lid, etc. etc. are all part of the mitzva to make the Sanctuary. The prohibition against removing the carrying poles is its own mitzva.

The "Testimony" (the LUCHOT, a.k.a. Tablets) shall be placed in the Aron.

[SDT] Some commentaries describe the ARON as three nested, open-top boxes – an outer box of gold, a middle box of wood, and an inner box of gold which had a rim to cover over the thickness of the wooden box, so that only gold would be visible both from the outside and inside of the ARON. There are different opinions asto how thick the gold plating was.


Second Aliya - 24 p'sukim (25:17-40)

A thick, solid gold lid (called the KAPORET) is to be made for the Aron. From the lid are to be formed two Cherubs facing each other with their wings spread out above the lid. Communication from G-d will be from "between the two K'ruvim"

It seems a bit strange that we would be commanded to make the K'ruvim in light of the strong prohibitions against graven images. And more so, if we note the chonology of the events in the months following the Exodus – specifically, that the command to build the Mikdash followed in the wake of the Golden Calf fiasco. The"answer" is that G-d is the Boss. He says no graven images – then we don't. And the Golden Calf is the ultimate affront to G-d. He commands us to make the K'ruvim, then we do. There are many examples of this idea. Lighting fire is forbidden on Shabbat. In the Mikdash it is required. In Piku'ach Nefesh situations it isrequired. This is not contradictory. This is recognizing G-d's mastery of the world and our commitment to follow His commands.

A special table of gold-plated wood shall be made; a frame and decorative border to the frame are to be made of gold. Four gold rings are to be attached to the legs of the table as receptacles for the carrying rods. Shelves and supports for the shelves complete the Shulchan. The Lechem Panim (Showbread) are to be placedon the Shulchan at all times [97].

MITZVA WATCH This is not considered just a detail of the making of the Shulchan, but as its own mitzva. The mitzva involved baking 12 special loaves (they were halachically matza) on Friday to replace the previous week's loaves on Shabbat. Tradition records a weekly miracle that the one week old Lechem HaPanim was found to be freshby the kohanim on duty who shared in it. This mitzva makes the statement that we should not view food as just the physical necessity that the rest of the world sees it as, but rather we are challenged to add a spiritual dimension to even the most mundane of our human activities. The Lechem HaPanim are the model; our lawsof kashrut, brachot, and other areas of Halacha help us achieve the spiritual levels of this concept. G-d does not eat. But He includes bread in the set-up of the Mikdash to teach us how important it is for us to add a spiritual dimension to the mundane.

In the Shabbat Z'mira, KI ESHM'RA SHABBAT, we sing that G-d gave a Torah-mitzva to the Kohanim to put the Lechem HaPanim on the Shulchan on Shabbat. Therefore, we are forbidden to fast on Shabbat (except for Yom Kippur). In other words, because G-d included food in the Mikdash routine of Shabbat, it can be seen as inconceivablethat food should not play a significant role in our Shabbat. This idea can also draw upon our first introduction to the Shabbat, in Parshat B'shalach. The context was the Manna and emphasis was placed on what would and what would not happen on Shabbat. Both these sources tell us that food is a significant factor on Shabbat.Three Meals. Special foods. Prohibition to Fast. Kiddush rules. Lechem Mishna rules. Etc.

(some Chumashim put Shlishi here)

The Menora is to be made of solid gold, one continuous piece, a central branch with six side branches (3 on a side), decorative orbs, flowers, and cups adorned the ends of each branch, with additional ones on the central branch. The Menora's utensils were also made of gold. Additionally, there was a 3-step platform thatwas used by the Kohen when he tended and lit the Menora. In fact, the Kohen would be able to reach the oil lamps even without the platform, but climbing onto the platform allowed the Kohen Gadol NOT to raise his hands above the level of his forehead, because of the TZITZ which he wore. (It was considered disrespectfulfor the K.G. to raise his hands above the TZITZ.) The steps also made tending the Menora more comfortable.

Sources tell us that G-d had to show Moshe a fiery form of the Menora so that he would see how it was to be formed.


Third Aliya14 p'sukim (26:1-14)

The MISHKAN (the term is used for the whole structure as well as the fabric covering) was a roofless structure covered by three layers of coverings. The first was called the Mishkan and was made of 10 panels of woven fabric made from 3 different colors of dyed wool, plus white linen. Five panels were attached to form onesection; same for the other five. The two sections were linked with buttons of gold through loops of blue wool. The weave of the Mishkan included images known as K'ruvim.

Above the Mishkan was an 11-panel covering (sections of six and five panels joined with copper buttons) made of goats hair. The Mishkan was decorative; this covering, known as the OHEL, was utilitarian, affording protection from the elements. The OHEL and MISHKAN covered the sides of the Mishkan as well as the top.

The topmost covering (some say it was just on the top, not the sides) was made of red-dyed sheepskin and the skin of the Tachash. (The identity of the Tachash is in dispute; some say that it was an animal that existed at that time only, specifically for the purpose of making the MICHSEH, the top-covering of the Mishkan.See under NESTO for some other opinions)

FOR YOUR INFORMATION... The Mishkan, as described in the Torah, functioned for the 40 years of the Wilderness, and the first 14 years in Eretz Yisrael, the years of conquest and settlement. After that, a stone structure - with the same dimensions - was made in SHILO to replace the gold- covered wood wall sections. The three coverings were thesame, as were the furnishings inside the Mishkan. The Mishkan stood in SHILO for 369 years.


Fourth Aliya - 16 p'sukim (26:15-30)

The walls of the Mishkan were made of gold-plated wooden boards. Each board was to have two pegs to be inserted into silver foundation sockets. Adjoining boards are to be joined by square gold rings through slits at the top of the boards; connecting rods through rings mounted on the sides of the boards above and below theirmid-lines; and a central bolt through the center of the boards, internally. There were to be 20 boards each for the north and south walls, and eight boards on the west wall. The east wall was open, covered by a special curtain.

Something to think about... Perusing the many books on the Mishkan and Beit HaMikdash, one discovers differing opinions among our sources in many, many of the details. Although the Torah is fairly detailed – and the Talmud adds many more details, there are many points open to speculation. Were the wall boards of uniform thickness or did they tapertowards the top? What did the decorations look like? Etc. Etc. The important question that follows all of these different opinions is this: Does it make a difference?

Let's try to answer that on a "tachlis" level. We are waiting for the third Beit HaMikdash. Groups of people have started preparing for it in a practical manner. They have made some of the vessels to be used in the Beit HaMikdash. Among other things, they made a Menora.

Will it be able to be used in the next Beit HaMikdash? It's made of silver, not gold. That's allowed. It doesn't have the ornate decorations and design. That too is okay when the Menora is not made of gold. It was not hammered out from one piece. Okay, too, for non-gold Menora. So far, so good. Is it the right size? How long is a Tefach? What shape are the limbs of the Menora? Don't know. How much of a deviation from the "correct" shape & size is allowable? Don't know. So will the Menora that already exists in the Temple Institute in the Old City be usable in the next Beit HaMikdash until a proper gold is made?

That's the question. (Personal opinion; gut feeling) The Sanhedrin at the time will rule on these questions. It could go either way. To whatever they say "yes", we will smile and have a head start on the Beit HaMikdash. For theitems that they reject – gems, Kohen's garments, spices, vessels, whatever – we will be given instructions as to how to properly finish the job. Bottom line, it's all real. Our longing should be real. Our prayers should be real. So too our hopes.

Rashi brings a Midrash that says that Yaakov Avinu foresaw with Divine Vision that wood would be needed by his descendants upon their departure from Egypt. He brought saplings with him to Egypt which he planted and ordered his children to take the wood with them when they left Egypt.


Fifth Aliya7 p'sukim (26:31-37)

A woven curtain (like the first covering of the Mishkan) was to be hung from four gold-plated wooden pillars to separate between the Holy of Holies and the main hall of the Sanctuary. This curtain is called the PAROCHET, and gives its name to the curtain which we place on the Aron Kodesh in shul. Their functions are notthe same; their names are.

[sdt] Rashi says that PAROCHET has the connotation of a partition (as opposed to a curtain covering an entrance), similar, says Rashi, to the word PARGOD, something that separates a king from his subjects.

MA'ASEI CHOSHEIV, explains Rashi, is highly skilled weaving which results in different designs on each of the two sides of the fabric.

The Aron is to be put into the Holy of Holies. The Shulchan on the north wall opposite the Menora on the south wall are placed outside the Parochet in the main section of the Mishkan. (The custom is to place the Chanukiya on the south wall of the shul, to remind us of the Menora of the Mikdash.)

A curtain similar to the Parochet was to be hung across the entrance of the Mishkan. This MASACH is to be hung on five wooding pillars plated with gold, fitted with golden hooks, and inserted into gold foundation sockets. The Parochet and Masach were woven from yarn which consisted of 6 threads each of the 3 colors of wool and white linen, i.e. 24 threads in the yarn that was used for this purpose.


Sixth Aliya - 8 p'sukim (27:1-8)

The Mizbei'ach (Altar) is to be made of wood, plated with copper. It is a square with raised corners. All vessels and utensils for this Altar were to be made of copper, as are the rings for the carrying rods. This Altar was outside the Mishkan, in the courtyard of the Mikdash and was used for most of the sacrifices. (Asopposed to the internal, golden, incense Altar - not mentioned in this sedra).

The Torah says that this Altar was 3 amot tall. R. Yehuda says: understand it as it is written. R. Yosi says: just as the internal Altar is twice as tall as it is wide and long, so too is this one. It measures 5 amot square, therefore it is 10 amot tall. But the Torah says three? That is from its SOVEV.


Seventh Aliya - 11 p'sukim (27:9-19)

Linen curtains were to be made, as were wooden columns, decorated with silver. The courtyard curtains were to be hung from silver hooks on these columns. Each column was supported by a copper foundation socket. An entrance curtain was to be woven in the style of the Mishkan, the Parochet, and the Masach, to be hung acrossthe eastern side of the courtyard. Copper spikes helped anchor the curtains that surrounded the Mishkan. The last three p'sukim are reread for the Maftir.

The parsha of T'RUMA can be perceived as boring by people with the wrong attitude. Lots of irrelevant details. Etc. But with the right attitude - and conveying and nurturing a positive attitude is as important, if not more so, than teaching material in the relationship of parent and child, teacher and student, friend andfriend. The Mikdash is a precious series of chapters in our past, and a significant part of our future. There are many books on the market to help our imagination along. T'ruma and its fellow sedras can come alive. You can make it happen.


20 p'sukim - 1 Kings 5:26-6:13

Parallel to the command to the Bnei Yisrael in the Wilderness to build the Mishkan, the Haftara describes the monumental task undertaken by Shlomo HaMelech in building the first Beit HaMikdash. The reading begins with a statement that Shlomo received the wisdom he had asked for. Then it mentions the treaty between Hiramof Tyre and Shlomo HaMelech. A work force of 30,000 Jews was conscripted for the difficult task of quarrying stone and cutting of wood for the construction of the Beit HaMikdash.

The building of the Beit HaMikdash began in the 480th year following the Exodus, in the month of Iyar, which is here identified as ZIV. Towardsthe end of the Haftara, we have an important "clarification' of the command to build the Mikdash from the Torah. In the sedra we read: Build a Sanctuary and I will dwell among you. What G-d said to Shlomo HaMelech was this: The House which you are building, IF you follow My statutes and obey My laws, and loyally followall My mitzvot, then I will keep My promise to your father David and I will dwell in the midst of the Children of Israel and I will never abandon My people. In other words, the mere physical construction of a Mikdash does not guarantee that the Divine Presence will be with us.

The bottom line, as it always is, is thatwe must be faithful to HaShem and His Mitzvot. Temples and sacrifices, and all kinds of religious rites are meaningless (and probably worse than meaningless) without our loyalty to HaShem. The Mikdash and all the rest help us realize our goals.